Current:Home > reviewsThings to know about a federal judge’s ruling temporarily blocking California’s gun law -ProfitLogic
Things to know about a federal judge’s ruling temporarily blocking California’s gun law
View
Date:2025-04-17 12:20:22
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Democrats running California’s government have passed some of the strictest gun laws in the country, but those efforts to restrict firearm access are increasingly facing successful challenges in court.
Gun rights groups have been aggressively fighting the laws, often winning initial rulings in their favor before heading to appeal. They’ve gotten a recent boost from the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, which set a new standard for interpreting gun laws. That standard says gun laws must be assessed by whether they are “consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.”
They won again on Wednesday, when a federal judge temporarily blocked a law that would ban people from carrying guns in most public places.
WHAT DID THE LAW DO?
The law banned people from carrying guns in most public places. The list included all daycare and school grounds, college campuses, government and judicial buildings, medical facilities, public parks and playgrounds, correctional institutions, public transit, public demonstrations and gatherings, athletic and professional sporting facilities, public libraries, amusement parks, zoos and museums, places of worship, banks, polling places, gambling establishments, any place where alcohol is sold and any other privately owned commercial establishment that is open to the public — unless the business owner put up a sign saying guns are OK.
WHY DID CALIFORNIA HAVE THIS LAW?
In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down New York’s law that required people to show a need for carrying a gun when applying for a permit to carry a concealed weapon. California’s law was similar to New York’s law. This year, the Democrats who control the state Legislature passed a new law that they said compiled with the court’s ruling.
WHY DID THE JUDGE BLOCK IT?
Cormac Carney, a U.S. district judge in Los Angeles who was appointed by former Republican President George W. Bush, said the law went too far. Carney said the law means lawful gun owners won’t be allowed to carry guns in nearly every public place in California. He said this effectively abolished “the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding and exceptionally qualified citizens to be armed and to defend themselves in public.” He also noted California has a lengthy application and thorough background check for people wanting a permit.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
The law was supposed to take effect on Jan. 1. Now, the law is on hold while the case makes its way through the federal court system. California Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta said he will appeal the ruling, saying “we believe the court got this wrong.” The case could ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Carney said he thought the law would ultimately be struck down.
WHAT OTHER CALIFORNIA GUN LAWS ARE FACING CHALLENGES?
Other California gun laws facing lawsuits include requiring gun stores to have digital surveillance systems, banning detachable magazines that have more than 10 bullets, restricting the sale of new handguns in the state, requiring state officials to pre-approve all ammunition sales and banning the sale of assault-style weapons. All of those are at various stages of the legal process, which can sometimes take years to complete.
veryGood! (2541)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Ariana Madix Is Making Her Love Island USA Debut Alongside These Season 5 Singles
- See Timothée Chalamet Transform Into Willy Wonka in First Wonka Movie Trailer
- Kelsea Ballerini Shares Insight Into Chase Stokes Romance After S--tstorm Year
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Does Love Is Blind Still Work? Lauren Speed-Hamilton Says...
- Countries Want to Plant Trees to Offset Their Carbon Emissions, but There Isn’t Enough Land on Earth to Grow Them
- What's Making Us Happy: A guide to your weekend viewing and listening
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Environmental Advocates Call on Gov.-Elect Wes Moore to Roll Back State Funding for Fossil Fuel Industry
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Charli D'Amelio Shares 6 Deals You’ll Find in Her Amazon Cart for Prime Day 2023
- How a New ‘Battery Data Genome’ Project Will Use Vast Amounts of Information to Build Better EVs
- What you need to know about aspartame and cancer
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Tribes object. But a federal ruling approves construction of the largest lithium mine
- The creator of luxury brand Brother Vellies is fighting for justice in fashion
- New Toolkit of Health Guidance Helps Patients and Care Providers on the Front Lines of Climate Change Prepare for Wildfires
Recommendation
'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
What to know about Prime, the Logan Paul drink that Sen. Schumer wants investigated
Vanessa Hudgens' Amazon Prime Day 2023 Picks Will Elevate Your Self-Care Routine
We spoil 'Barbie'
Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
How photographing action figures healed my inner child
Summer School 1: Planet Money goes to business school
Petition Circulators Are Telling California Voters that a Ballot Measure Would Ban New Oil and Gas Wells Near Homes. In Fact, It Would Do the Opposite